![need sudo access on macos need sudo access on macos](https://miro.medium.com/max/896/1*Cj8JEDppGjBeBOop9fF13A.png)
etc/sudoers need to be synced everytime there is a change. Network wide different installations may not support this approach (however openrbac could be considered as common implementation approach) like sudoers is a single host approach or is not capable of centralized configuration in the network/domain. Different approaches exist for doing a single thing. Since SELinux is not scalable/implemented on Solaris and RBAC/pfexec tools are not implemented on Linux. However, when there are heterogeneous Unix installations in the network and the user database is common, then this would perhaps fail. RBAC would sound a greater solution in homogeneous environments. Implementing RBAC is a lot of work in an organisation, especially when there are many users. This approach is more better because this would keep the privileges of the users already elevated and would trust on the conscience and alertness of what sysadmins would want to do with their privileges.Ĭonsidering the available solutions of RBAC and its implementations in Linux world, I stumbled acrossĪnd while there are some other implementations, I would consider them in the top order of the list. To see the solutions and my quest to find the alternatives, I came across Resource Based Access Controls RBAC but in an other adventure land of Solaris with tools like pfexec etc. My guys have always expressed their concern to me that they have to type sudo for everything they wanted to do with elevated privileges in Linux environment. (I can always do some sneaky peaky with sudoers log information to find the culprits as well). Even if something goes wrong, they stand responsible.
![need sudo access on macos need sudo access on macos](https://www.igeeksblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Enter-Command-to-Enable-Root-User-on-Mac.png)
I am not sure if it could be related but what can I say is that, sudo does give you a better security perspective of who all and what can they do with their trusted privileges. At the same time, it is my trust on them that keeps their entries present in the sudoers configuration file. sudo has been a greater advantage resource to delegate some of my routine tasks and privileges as (root) user to some others and help manage my time and others time better without elevating the privilegs to beyond more than what is required.
![need sudo access on macos need sudo access on macos](https://oldblog.arktronic.com/assets/page-data/hackintosh-sierra-download.jpg)
sudo allows to execute few things as some other users, most often cases as root for system administration. Its always been my ideology that, as a user you can do whatever you want on Linux and for everything else, there is always sudo. Permissions issues for shared directory on a server or Backup script permission issue. Access control lists give you this ability. It is sometimes convenient to allow multiple users to write in a directory, or otherwise to have different permissions for several users other than the owner or for multiple groups. After that one-time operation ( sudo chown … or sudo -u webmaster setfacl …), you won't need elevated privileges for day-to-day operations. If you're working on a development server and want your files to be accessible instantly, create a directory in the web server area and make it owned or at least writable by you.
#Need sudo access on macos update
Usually, that would be performed by an installation script, and you would run something like sudo -u webmaster install-webserver-files, or better sudo -u webmaster git update (or the version control system of your choice). If there are files that you want to put up on your web server, work as your own user and then use sudo to drop the files in place in the web serving area of your filesystem. Generally speaking, always work as your own user unless you're doing something with a system-wide impact.